There’s a chance I’m becoming judgy.
I wish it weren’t so. Being judgy is not particularly a good quality and is usually used to describe someone who rushes to an opinion, typically holding harsh or critical thoughts of others, without reason. Judgy people are perhaps close-minded based on little to no information.
Oh dear.
When Roger and I moved to Crockern we would see next to no one walking up the footpath, particularly on a weekday with cold wind and rain. The odd pair of serious hikers, perhaps, equipped with a small pack of provisions, proper waterproof gear, sturdy hiking boots and a map or deep internal knowledge of the Dartmoor landscape from experience.
But now? On any given day of the week, even with severe storm warnings and cancelled flights across the southern part of the country, undeterred crowds in the hundreds shuffle past, seeking their instagramable tourist destination: Wistman’s Woods.
In the past twelve years, we’ve watched the numbers tick up exponentially. With this, there has been a good deal of destruction to the woods. In addition to huge amounts of litter, we’ve found cut and burned branches. We have witnessed middle-aged men and women filling their shopping bags with tree moss for their garden planters. There have been weddings with lit candles hanging in the trees. Amateur music videos complete with ridiculous costumes from some D&D fantasy. We’ve also found the ashes and shrines of dead people, discarded tents, diapers, drug paraphernalia, food wrappers, drink containers and sadly, portable barbeques to name but a few things.
Oh, and then there are the pooh bags. This topic is the material for another blog.
Regular morning walks with the dogs are now comprised of routine litter picking. I’m not to the level of David Sedaris and his 60,000+ daily steps as he fills bags of litter in Sussex, but I can see how his obsession took hold. The West Dart Valley on Dartmoor is a Special Area of Conservation and is a protected landscape. It’s a National Nature Reserve. The Woods are a Site of Special Scientific Intertest (SSSI for those who like acronyms) and home to rare mosses, lichens, beetles and is a rare example of a temperate rain forest. All this disregard for its significance fills us with a heady mixture of sadness and irritation.
And while we can’t stem the tide of what is happening, we can land our dismay solidly on footwear. And we do. Turns out, we’re not alone, either. In a study out of University of Kansas, people were best at judging an unknown person’s age, sex and income based on a simple picture of their shoes! Maybe you’re already doing it too.
“Roger, get a load of these shoes walking up the track!” I might call out. “Those are ridiculous.” Is a likely reply from Roger.
When the two of us first met, a friend played for me the Kirsty MacColl song, “In These Shoes.” Of course at the time, the relevant lyric was, “I once met an Englishman…..” As we observe many people underprepared for what Dartmoor can throw at them, it’s the repeating refrain question that now resonates. MacColl, in her singular voice extols her female empowerment as she meets a “man with a sense of adventure,” then “a guy with a faraway look”, and finally “an Englishman.” Answering each of their propositions with the simple question: “In these shoes?”
She’s obviously talking about her own shoes not befitting the situation. But when the melody lands in my head, I’m referring to footwear not suitable for this wet, muddy, uneven, eroded, slippery, potential ankle breaking, sheep/cow poop covered area. A small sampling of what we’ve seen stride past: Kitten heals, treadless Sneakers, Flip Flops, Shower Shoes, Slippers, Low-heel Pumps, Ballet shoes, Plimsoles, Moccasins, Loafers, Cowboy Boots, Uggs, Brogues, Crocs, Sandals, Chuck Taylor High-tops and yes, Bare Feet.
Okay, I get it. The healthy approach is to judge actions and not people. So in that fun, poppy song where the question is asked, “In these shoes?” Our answer is, “Good luck.”